Which of the following describes a legal sufficiency of evidence that might reach a jury in a trial?

The term "prima facie" refers to evidence that is sufficient to establish a fact or raise a presumption unless disproven or countered. In a legal context, it means that the evidence presented is adequate on its face to support a particular outcome or conclusion, allowing a jury to proceed with considering the case. This concept is crucial because it establishes the initial burden of proof that a party must meet to show that their claim has merit, warranting further examination by the jury.

Understanding "prima facie" helps clarify why it is one of the first thresholds in legal proceedings, as it allows cases to move forward in a trial. It addresses whether the presented evidence adequately supports the claims made, and if so, it must be accepted as credible unless it is effectively challenged by opposing parties. Other terms like "substantial evidence," "corroborating evidence," and "incontrovertible evidence" each have their distinct roles and definitions in legal proceedings but do not serve to describe the initial sufficiency of evidence needed to get a case to a jury in quite the same way as "prima facie."