What does “readback” refer to in court reporting?

The term "readback" in court reporting specifically refers to the process of reciting previously recorded testimony for confirmation or correction. This practice is essential in ensuring the accuracy of the record and allowing parties involved in the proceedings—such as the judge, attorneys, or witnesses—to verify what has been said. By allowing testimony to be read back, it provides an opportunity for immediate clarification and accuracy before continuing with the proceedings. This aspect of court reporting is critical for maintaining the integrity of the official record.

The other options relate to different aspects of court processes but do not accurately define readback. For example, a review of court documents for accuracy focuses on the editorial aspect of legal documents rather than the interactive verification of spoken testimony. Summarizing court proceedings after conclusion pertains to the final output of the court reporting process but does not involve the immediate feedback mechanism of readback. Lastly, the method of filing court transcripts is related to the organizational aspect of record-keeping and not to the verification process present in readback. Each of these alternatives addresses different functions within the court system, but only readback directly relates to the recitation of previously recorded material for confirmation.