The examination of jurors by the Court to see that they stand indifferent is called:

The process of examining jurors to ensure that they are impartial and unbiased is known as voir dire. This practice allows the court, as well as attorneys from both sides, to ask potential jurors questions to identify any preconceived notions, biases, or relationships that may affect their ability to fairly decide the case. It is a crucial step in the jury selection process, as it helps to uphold the principle of a fair trial by confirming that selected jurors can serve without prejudice.

In voir dire, the court can also assess the jurors' backgrounds and experiences to ensure a diverse and representative jury pool that reflects community standards. The effectiveness of this process influences the integrity of the judicial system, as a fair and impartial jury is essential for justice.

Alternative terms like cross-examination refer specifically to questioning witnesses during a trial rather than jurors. Adverse questioning is not a standard term used in this context and does not pertain directly to the juror examination process. Rejection relates to dismissing potential jurors but does not capture the active role of investigating juror impartiality that occurs in voir dire. Thus, voir dire is the accurate term for this important judicial process.